Dead Ringer (1963)

Dead Ringer (1963)

Synopsis: 

In Dead Ringer, Bette Davis plays twin sisters who lead very different lives. One sister, Edith, is a successful and wealthy owner of a nightclub, while the other, the troubled and envious, is looking to escape her mundane existence. Consumed by jealousy, she kills Edith and assumes her identity. As she navigates this new life, she faces the scrutiny of a diligent police sergeant (Karl Malden) and a charming suitor (Peter Lawford), leading to a tense game of cat and mouse as her deception unravels.

Notable Actors:

Bette Davis as the twin sisters

Karl Malden as Police Sergeant

Peter Lawford as the suitor

Philip Carey as the nightclub manager

Jean Hagen as a supporting character

Trivia:

1. Bette Davis received critical acclaim for her dual role, showcasing her range as an actress.
2. The film was directed by Paul Henreid, who is best known for his role in Casablanca.
3. The film explores themes of identity, envy, and the consequences of deception.

Rating: 

The rating of ★★★★☆ (4/5) for Dead Ringer reflects its strong performances, particularly by Bette Davis, who masterfully portrays both sisters with depth and nuance. The film's engaging plot twists and psychological tension keep viewers captivated, as it explores themes of envy, identity, and the consequences of deception.

The direction by Paul Henreid adds to the film's noir atmosphere, effectively creating suspense throughout. The supporting cast, including Karl Malden and Peter Lawford, contributes to the tension and intrigue of the story. 

However, while the film is compelling, it may feel dated to some modern audiences, and certain pacing issues can detract from the overall impact. Nevertheless, Dead Ringer stands out for its strong character development and gripping narrative, making it a noteworthy thriller in its era.

Comparison: 

Dead Ringer shares thematic similarities with Gone Girl (2014), both featuring complex female protagonists who manipulate their identities to achieve their desires. While Dead Ringer leans more towards classic film noir with its psychological twists, Gone Girl offers a modern take on marital deceit and media manipulation. Both films effectively keep audiences on the edge of their seats with their suspenseful narratives and intricate character developments.

Strait-Jacket (1964)

 Strait-Jacket (1964)

Runtime: 1 hour, 33 minutes

Genre: Horror, Thriller, Drama

Rating: TV-14

Directed by: William Castle

Starring: Joan Crawford, Diane Baker, Leif Erickson, Howard St. John, John Anthony Hayes, Rochelle Hudson, George Kennedy, Edith Atwater, Mitchell Cox

Audio/Subtitles: English

---

Synopsis:

Strait-Jacket tells the chilling tale of Lucy Harbin (Joan Crawford), a woman who was institutionalized for 20 years after brutally decapitating her husband and his lover in a jealous rage. Upon her release, she is reunited with her daughter Carol (Diane Baker), who was a child at the time of the murders. Lucy struggles to reintegrate into society and rebuild her relationship with Carol, but things take a dark turn when a series of axe murders begin to occur, raising the question: Is Lucy falling back into her old violent ways, or is something more sinister at play?

---

Notable Actors:

Joan Crawford as Lucy Harbin: A legendary figure in Hollywood, Crawford delivers a powerful performance as the tormented, emotionally scarred protagonist. Known for her strong screen presence, Crawford brings depth to the role of a woman haunted by her past.

Diane Baker as Carol Harbin: Carol is Lucy’s daughter, who tries to help her mother adjust to life after her release from the asylum. Baker portrays Carol with a mix of love and suspicion, making her central to the film’s mystery.

Leif Erickson as Bill Cutler: Bill is Lucy's brother-in-law, who is concerned about her return to the family home.

George Kennedy as Leo Krause: A handyman who gets caught up in the mystery of the recent murders.

---

Trivia:

• William Castle's Gimmicks: Castle, the film’s director, was known for using gimmicks to market his films. For Strait-Jacket, audiences attending the premiere were given cardboard axes as souvenirs, adding to the film’s campy yet thrilling experience.
• Joan Crawford's Involvement: Crawford took her role in Strait-Jacket seriously and worked closely with William Castle to improve the script and production. She even made demands to change the casting, and some believe her presence elevated the film far beyond typical B-horror flicks of the time.
• A Nod to Psycho (1960): The film draws obvious inspiration from Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho, particularly with the focus on psychological trauma and axe murders. The screenplay was written by Robert Bloch, who also penned the novel Psycho.

---

Rating:

4.5/5. Strait-Jacket delivers as a psychological horror with an engaging mystery and plenty of suspense. Joan Crawford's performance adds gravitas to the B-movie horror, making it a classic of the genre. The film's tension builds steadily, keeping viewers guessing until the shocking finale. The axe-wielding murders and the themes of sanity and guilt are classic horror tropes, used effectively to create an eerie, unsettling atmosphere.

---

Comparison:

Strait-Jacket is often compared to later psychological horror films like What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962), which also starred Joan Crawford. Both films explore the themes of madness, aging, and the tension between familial relationships. While Strait-Jacket is more straightforward in its slasher elements, it shares similarities with Psycho (1960) in its exploration of mental health and trauma.

More modernly, Strait-Jacket can be compared to the 2019 film Ma, starring Octavia Spencer, in which a woman with a traumatic past takes revenge on a younger generation. Both films depict women grappling with their dark histories while unraveling in psychological horror settings.

The Mad Room (1969)

The Mad Room (1969) is a psychological horror film that dives into the themes of mental illness, family dynamics, and paranoia. Directed by Bernard Girard, the movie is a remake of the 1941 film Ladies in Retirement but with a contemporary twist for the late 1960s.

Synopsis:

The story centers around Ellen Hardy (played by Stella Stevens), a young woman who works as a live-in secretary for a wealthy socialite, Mrs. Armstrong (played by Beverly Garland). Ellen's life takes a turn when her younger siblings, George (Michael Burns) and Mandy (Barbara Sammeth), are released from a mental institution after being accused of murdering their parents years earlier. Ellen tries to keep their troubled past a secret, but things spiral out of control when another murder occurs, raising suspicions about whether the siblings are truly cured or still dangerous.

Notable Actors:

Stella Stevens as Ellen Hardy

Shelley Winters as Mrs. Armstrong

Beverly Garland as Mrs. Racine

Michael Burns as George

Barbara Sammeth as Mandy

Trivia:

- Shelley Winters, known for her intense roles, adds tension to the film with her portrayal of the domineering Mrs. Armstrong.

- The film taps into the late 1960s fascination with psychological horror, following the success of Psycho (1960) and Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962).

Director:

Bernard Girard, whose filmography spans different genres, brings a slow-burn atmosphere to the movie, with heavy reliance on mood and character psychology.

Rating:

3/5 stars 

While the performances, particularly by Shelley Winters and Stella Stevens, are commendable, the pacing can feel a bit slow, and the plot predictable by today’s standards. However, it's a decent thriller for fans of vintage psychological horror.

Comparison to a newer TV show or movie:

If you enjoy The Mad Room, you might find similarities with the Netflix series The Haunting of Hill House (2018). Both deal with family secrets, psychological trauma, and the question of what’s real versus imagined. They focus on siblings with a troubled past and include elements of both psychological and supernatural horror, blending slow-burn tension with moments of genuine fright.

What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962)

 What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962)

Synopsis:

*What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?* is a psychological horror thriller centered on the dysfunctional relationship between two aging sisters, Jane and Blanche Hudson, both former stars in show business. Jane, a former child star, is now mentally unstable and holds a deep resentment toward Blanche, who was once a successful actress before a mysterious car accident left her paralyzed. The film follows Jane's increasingly erratic behavior as she holds Blanche captive in their decaying Hollywood mansion, leading to shocking and chilling outcomes.

Notable Actors:

- **Bette Davis** as Baby Jane Hudson

- **Joan Crawford** as Blanche Hudson

- **Victor Buono** as Edwin Flagg

- **Maidie Norman** as Elvira Stitt

Trivia:

- The real-life rivalry between Bette Davis and Joan Crawford added a layer of tension to their performances. Their feud became one of Hollywood's most infamous off-screen dramas.

- Bette Davis was nominated for an Academy Award for her role as Jane Hudson. The makeup for her character was deliberately grotesque, with Davis insisting on applying the makeup herself to create an unsettling, decaying look for Jane.

- The film revitalized both actresses' careers and is considered a landmark in the "Grande Dame Guignol" subgenre, where older actresses play roles in psychological horror films.

- Victor Buono, who played Edwin Flagg, was also nominated for an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor.

Director:

- **Robert Aldrich**, known for his work in various genres, including westerns, war films, and thrillers. His direction of *What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?* is one of his most acclaimed projects, cementing his legacy in the psychological horror genre.

Rating: 

4.5/5 stars

    *What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?* is indeed a classic of psychological horror, and this is largely due to its skillful blending of psychological tension, eerie atmosphere, and unforgettable performances by Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. The film thrives on the tension between the two sisters, both victims of their own insecurities and long-standing grudges. The decaying mansion they live in becomes a metaphor for their crumbling mental states, especially Jane's, whose behavior spirals further into madness as the story progresses.

The horror in *Baby Jane* is not based on gore or jump scares but rather on the deeply unsettling psychological torment Jane inflicts on Blanche. Jane’s grotesque appearance—her garish makeup, doll-like outfits, and erratic behavior—mirrors the decay of her mind. The film's atmosphere of dread builds gradually, as Jane's actions become more disturbing, trapping both Blanche and the audience in a claustrophobic nightmare. The sight of Jane serving Blanche a "special meal" of dead pets or performing a grotesque vaudeville routine adds a layer of dark, twisted humor that only heightens the sense of unease.

At its core, the movie is a character study of two women grappling with lost fame, envy, and bitterness. Jane's inability to let go of her past glory leads her to resent Blanche, who once eclipsed her as an actress, while Blanche, immobilized and vulnerable, becomes a tragic figure whose guilt and passivity render her powerless against her sister’s cruelty.

The performances of Davis and Crawford are central to the film’s lasting impact. Davis, in particular, delivers a fearless portrayal of Jane, embracing the character's grotesqueness and instability, while Crawford plays Blanche with a subtle dignity that contrasts with Jane's mania. The tension between the two actresses in real life infuses their scenes with a raw energy that makes their interactions all the more intense and uncomfortable.

The film's sense of "decay" extends beyond just Jane’s mental state and physical appearance. The mansion they live in is a crumbling relic of Hollywood's golden age, much like the sisters themselves. This physical and emotional decay creates a haunting backdrop for the unraveling of Jane’s fragile psyche, making the house feel as though it, too, is a living part of their tragic downfall.

In the tradition of psychological horror, *What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?* stands out for its emphasis on the internal horrors of guilt, jealousy, and the passage of time, making it a deeply unsettling experience that lingers long after the credits roll. The film’s ability to disturb lies not in what it shows but in what it implies, making it a masterclass in sustained tension, psychological manipulation, and emotional decay.

Comparison:

If you enjoyed *What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?*, you might find similarities in **Ryan Murphy's TV series *Feud: Bette and Joan* (2017)**, which dramatizes the behind-the-scenes rivalry between Bette Davis and Joan Crawford during the making of this very film. The series explores the complicated dynamics between the actresses, echoing the themes of jealousy and faded fame seen in *Baby Jane* itself.